Main menu:

Recent News

Introduction to questioning HIV

Questioning HIV as a causative agent in developing AIDS is something most people just don't do. Very few people will discuss this subject if you start the conversation by stating that you have come to the conclusion that HIV cannot cause AIDS. I admit, we live in times where on any given day you can walk down the street and come across any number of people, zealots in fact, chanting slogans and shoving flyers in your face about anything from accepting Jesus to saving the Earth by using more efficient light bulbs. Skepticism and giving the cold shoulder is almost a necessity these days if you want to remain free of headaches.

It is not my intent to simply have more people agree with the position that HIV does not cause AIDS. This is not the intent of this site, nor is it something that will benefit any party. The idea is to expose yourself to information that doesn't make it on CNN, YahooNews, or your local paper and decide for yourself what your conclusion is. Alternative views on AIDS and HIV have been around since the day the epidemic officially was defined as a disease caused solely by a microscopic entity called HIV. What the majority of people saw were "public service announcements" which repeatedly stated that infamous mantra "HIV, the virus that causes AIDS." Without being trained in virology or possessing any real knowledge about isolation of disease causing entities the public took for granted that the noble scientists and experts know what they are doing and without missing a beat generous wealthy people started donating to AIDS charities, radio shows on the subject began, mass panic spread through the sexually active community, and of course the AIDS business was born.

But what if things are not as they seem.

I propose this is the case, in fact, and all that one needs to do is take a step back and ask yourself this question: "Am I absolutely, absolutely positive that HIV causes AIDS?" I would like to present some questions at this time about HIV and about AIDS:

Here's a quick quiz...

True or False:

All the above statements are false.

- You can take an HIV test and test indeterminate.
- The drug trials for HIV drugs are typically done by comparing two or more drugs and success is based on which drug does the least harm. In placebo controlled trials it is hard to determine legitimacy because so many have been proven to be fraudulent.
- HIV has never been isolated, and in fact there doesn't even exist in any scientific journal an original article proving that HIV causes AIDS.
- Scientists cannot explain how exactly this supposed super virus kills CD4 cells.
- In 2002 it was admitted that more than half of the deaths in people with HIV or AIDS were due to adverse reactions from the drugs or treatment.
- Pregnant mothers who test HIV positive are required by law to take AZT, which is the most notoriously damaging DNA chain terminator drug that the AIDS establishment has. If they refuse to take these drugs, or refuse to force their children to take these drugs then they risk their children being taken away from them. Pregnant mothers are told not to consume aspirin or drink coffee, yet we see nothing wrong with chemotherapy?
- Many countless people are alive to this day after testing positive for HIV and being diagnosed as AIDS patients. Some are still alive after 25 years and counting without ever taking any medication, without ever listening to their doctor. The AIDS establishment has a name for these people "long term non-progressors." Instead of being interested in these people and why they are still alive, they simply ignore their existence, as these people are a complete embarrassment to the HIV = AIDS orthodoxy which will have you believe that there is no way you live past maybe 15 years at the most before HIV will kill you.
- The virus HIV has been proven to be harder to transmit than initially thought. A well known study conducted called the Padian study examined hundreds of discordant couples where one person was HIV positive and the other person was negative to see how easily the virus could be passed on. After 10 years of collecting data, it was found that out of all the couples (many of whom reported unprotected sex) not even one person seroconverted. That is, not one person, after ten years went from testing HIV negative to HIV positive.
- The notion that live virus can be seen in people's blood who test HIV positive is another illusion. The whole diagnostic procedure relies on the individual's antibody reaction. Even the test kit manufacturers state in plain english on their test kits "At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood."

These are just some inconsistencies off the top of my head. Within this site I hope to present and provide links, original papers, interview transcripts, and as much information as I can to answer any and all questions that there may be concerning the HIV = AIDS paradigm. There are plenty of other topics to discuss about AIDS, for instance "African AIDS" or why it is that Magic Johnson is alive and well. I am very much open for debating these topics. I will answer emails as fast as my free time allows me. I also ask that if there is a question that this site does not have an answer to that you send an email with it and information about that specific subject matter will be provided and archived on this site.

I want to add something else. I didn't always hold the opinion that AIDS isn't caused by HIV. In fact I went through various stages. Up until high school I was completely sure that HIV caused AIDS. I was in fact afraid of getting infected with someone's blood if they were to get cut. I simply knew what most people knew about HIV: nothing, other than it was sexually transmitted or through blood, if you got it you were bound to die, and it led to some serious diseases like wasting syndrome. In high school I remember hearing something about the government being responsible for creating HIV in a lab to take out the homosexuals and blacks. I hated politics and I knew that the two main groups affected by AIDS were indeed blacks and homosexuals. It certainly seemed plausible, and so I kept that in the back of my mind. I couldn't really say that I believed it was true, but I certainly would ponder it whenever I heard HIV mentioned in the media. During my final year in high school I finally stumbled upon some information concerning government documents and I saw a few documentaries like "Origins of AIDS" and "The Strecker Memorandum" and one called "Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola." This spawned me into seriously considering the real possibility that HIV might have been a form of biological warfare. I found out about the vaccines that the WHO gave to people in Africa and how immediately afterward they started dying. I found out that similar things were going on with Hepatitis vaccine in some cities in America and those same people started dying of AIDS like symptoms. It was clear that something was up. And I was right. But it wasn't a virus that was leading to all this death. I soon realized this too and I didn't know what to think anymore. I didn't understand what was going on. If it was a virus for instance, I couldn't explain why it was only spreading to other men. If it was transmitted by needles, why didn't I hear about tattoo shops and accidental needle sticks from hospitals infecting people? Then I started finding out about the fact that some people had an AIDS diagnosis and were still alive and had not taken a single drug. That's when I watched the one documentary where I finally had a light bulb go on and I knew there was finally a sound explanation for the epidemiological occurrences and data that was so hard to make sense of before. This video was entitled HIV = AIDS: Fact or Fraud. I have a link to it in the video section of this site. After I had watched that documentary about 4 times to make sure I got every bit of info from it that I could I became much more interested and quite disgusted with the new information I was learning.

The fact of the matter is that most people believe HIV causes AIDS because they simply haven't heard any other opinion, and quite obviously don't even know that there is a very significant portion of doctors, medical professionals and yes, Nobel Prize winners who have come forth and risked their careers by stating that they do not agree with the AIDS establishment that HIV causes AIDS. One great quote from the recent documentary made by Gary Null entitled AIDS Inc states "if HIV causes anything, it certainly causes fundraisers."

It is my sincere hope that this site serves as a tool for gaining a much needed alternative and accurate view on HIV and AIDS, and hopefully a healthy skepticism in general.